Interoffice Memorandum
DATE: October 2, 2024
TO: Mayor Jerry L. Demings and County Commissioners
FROM: Carrie Mathes, CFCM, NIGP-CPP, CPPO, C.P.M., Manager II, Procurement Division
CONTACT: Lindy A. Wolfe, P.E., LEED AP, Manager II, Utilities Engineering Division
PHONE: 407-254-9918
SUBJECT: Selection of Consultant, Request for Proposals, Y24-820-GV Engineering Services for State Road 50
RECOMMENDATION:
title
Selection of one firm and an alternate to provide Engineering Services for State Road 50 (Florida Department of Transportation FID #239203-7), Request for Proposals Y24-820-GV from the following firms listed alphabetically:
• Barnes, Ferland, and Associates Inc.
• CPH Consulting, LLC.
Further request Board authorization for the Procurement Division to negotiate and execute a contract with a not-to-exceed budget of $3,250,000.
Further request Board authorization for the Procurement Division to formally terminate negotiations with the top ranked firm, if we are unable to come to a favorable negotiated agreement, and commence negotiations with the next ranked alternate, until a successful negotiation is reached. ([Utilities Department Engineering Division] Procurement Division)
body
PROCUREMENT:
The utility improvements include removing and replacing existing water and wastewater facilities to resolve any potential conflicts with the Florida Department of Transportation Project FID # 239203-7 road widening improvements along State Road 50 and Old Cheney Highway. This project is located in Districts 4 and 5.
FUNDING:
Funding is available in account numbers: 4420-038-1482-0066-6345 and 4420-038-1504-0080-6345.
DISCUSSION:
Three proposals were received in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP). The Procurement Committee evaluated the proposals in accordance with the criteria set forth in this RFP. M/S SIETRICON was deemed non-responsive for failure to submit the documents required in the RFP.
The proposals were evaluated by the Procurement Committee on September 25, 2024. Commissioner Christine Moore was assigned to the Procurement Committee.
The Procurement Committee’s consensus scores are attached.